Railroads and Populism 

| Back to Bibliography | Home | 

Aldrich, Mark. "A Note on Railroad Rates and the Populist Uprising." Agricultural History. 54(3): 424-432. 1980.  Railroad rates generally fell until about 1880, then began to rise into the 1890's. This was a major factor in the rise of Populism.  America: History and Life, 18A:7220

Beard, Earl S. "The Background of State Railroad Regulation in Iowa," Iowa Journal of History. 51:1‑36. January 1953.  

Benson, Lee. Merchants, Farmers and Railroads: Railroad Regulation and New York Politics, 1850‑1887. 310 p. Providence: Brown UP, 1964.  

Clark, Ira G. Then Came the Railroads: The Century from Steam to Diesel in the Southwest. Norman: U of Oklahoma P, 1958. Railroads were the whipping boy for all the accumulated woes plaguing the West.   

Crow, Jeffrey J. "'Populism to Progressivism' in North Carolina: Governor Daniel Russell and His War on the Southern Railway Company." Historian 1975 37(4): 649-667.  North Carolina's Populists were reformist.  Progressives would not aid Governor Daniel Russell's fight for railroad regulation during the 1890s, but who joined the fray in the early 1900s.  America: History and Life, 14A:8408

Danese, Tracy E. "Railroads, Farmers and Senatorial Politics: The Florida Railroad Commission in the 1890s." Florida Historical Quarterly 1996 75(2): 146-166.  Florida abolition its popular regulatory commission in 1891, only four years after its creation.  The transformation of Chipley, a railroad executive originally opposed to the commission, into a Populist caused the commission's resurrection in 1897.   America: History and Life, 34:16089

Decker, Leslie E. Railroads, Lands and Politics: The Taxation of the Railroad Land Grants, 1864-1897. 435 p. Providence: Brown UP, 1964.  Concerns land grants in Kansas and Nebraska.   

Dixon, Frank Haigh. "Railroad Control in Nebraska." Political Science Quarterly. 13(4):617‑47. December 1898. Discusses causes for Nebraska Populists' advocacy for nationalization of railroads.  

Doster, James Fletcher. Railroads in Alabama Politics, 1875‑1914. 273 p., maps. U of Alabama Studies No. 12. University: U of Alabama P, 1957.  

_____. "Were Populists Against Railroad Corporations? The Case of Alabama." Journal of Southern History. 20(3):395‑99. August 1954.  

Farmer, Hallie. "The Economic Background of Frontier Populism." Part II. "The Railroads and Frontier Populism." Ph.D. Dissertation (Political Science), University of Wisconsin - Madison, 1927. 

_____. "The Railroads and Frontier Populism." Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 13(3):387‑97. December 1926. Railroad oppression as a cause of agrarian revolt.  

Frank, Thomas. "The Leviathan with Tentacles of Steel: Railroads in the Minds of Kansas Populists." Western Historical Quarterly 1989 20(1): 37-54.   Railroads argued that they served the public interest in order to get land subsidies.  Afterward, they betrayed the public trust by operating exclusively on the profit motive.  Populists, thus, called for government ownership and operation of railroads in the public interest.  America: History and Life, 27:7067

Haney, Lewis Henry. Congressional History of Railways in the United States, 1850-1887. 335 p., illus. Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin No. 342. Economics and Political Science, vol. 6, No. 1. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1910.  

Harbeson, Robert W. "Railroads and Regulation, 1877‑1916: Conspiracy of Public Interest?" Journal of Economic History. 27(2):230‑42. June 1967. Argues that railroad legislation--even that supported by railroads--was not necessarily beneficial to the railroads, and detrimental to shippers and farmers.  

Higgs, Robert. "Railroad Rates and the Populist Uprising." Agricultural History 1970 44(3): 291-297.  Populists had good reason to complain of high railroad rates.  Carrying cost relative to crop prices did not change substantially between 1867 and 1896.  Thus, farmers did not benefit from the lower nominal transportation rates in the three decades before 1897.  America: History and Life, 8:1483

Jones, Virginia Bowen. "The Influence of the Railroads of Nebraska on Nebraska State Politics." M.A. thesis, U of Nebraska, 1927.  

Kolko, Gabriel. Railroads and Regulation, 1877‑1916. 273 p. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1965.   The railroads, rather than Populists, were strongest advocates of government regulation.  

Magliari, Michael. "Populism, Steamboats, and the Octopus: Transportation Rates and Monopoly in California's Wheat Regions, 1890-1896." Pacific Historical Review 1989 58(4): 449-469.  Among the California wheat growers, Populist strength varied directly with the grip of the Southern Pacific,  Populist strength was severely diluted by the presence of water transport.   America: History and Life, 28:3949

Miner, H. Craig. "The Oskaloosa Octopus: Jobbers, "Popocrats," and the Santa Fe Railway's False Receivership, 1896." Kansas Historical Quarterly 1972 38(4): 445-456.  A Populist judge cited an 1891 Kansas law prohibiting any corporation with more than 20 percent of their securities held by foreigners from possessing land in Kansas in an 1891 case involving the Santa Fe Railroad.  The railroad won on appealed.  Some see Populists attacking a corporation.  Others claim Republican businessmen who hoped to profit from the railroad's losses.  America: History and Life, S:7736

Paxson, Frederic L. "The Pacific Railroads and the Disappearance of the Frontier in America." Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1907. Vol. I. Pp. 105‑18. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1908. Notes. Significance of disappearance of free land.  

Press, Donald E. "Kansas Conflict: Populist Versus Railroader in the 1890s." Kansas Historical Quarterly 1977 43(3): 319-333.  In the 1890's, Kansas Populists alarmed railroaders by calling for maximum freight rates and state ownership of the railroads.  They were able to agree on railroad legislation only at a last-minute session after their defeat in 1898, when they created the Court of Visitation, with broad regulatory powers.  The Republican-controlled state supreme court declared the legislation unconstitutional two years later.  Many of the measures that the Populists advocated in the 1890's, including a maximum freight rate, became law under the Republicans in the succeeding decade.   America: History and Life, 16A:5503

_____. "Populist Influence on Kansas railroads, 1890-1910." Master's thesis, University of Missouri, Kansas City, 1974. 

Rich, Mary A. "Railroads and the Agrarian Interests of Kansas, 1865-1915." Master's thesis, University of Virginia, 1960. 

Riegel, Robert E. The Story of the Western Railroads, From 1852 Through the Reign of the Grants. 345 p. New York: Macmillan, 1926.  Reprinted Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1964.  

Ripley, William Z. Railroads, Rates, and Regulation. 659 p., maps, diagrams., bib. New York: Longmans, Green, 1912.  

Rysavy, Don. "D.W. Hines and the Farmers' Railroad: A Case Study in Populist Business Enterprise, 1894-1898." North Dakota Quarterly 47(4): 20-34. 1979.  Populists supported state construction of a railroad as an alternative to the exorbitant rates of the Great Northern and Northern Pacific railroads.   America: History and Life, 18A:3055

Stover, John F. American Railroads. 302 p. maps, illus. Chicago UP, 1961. See especially the bibliography, pp. 279‑80.  

Stromquist, Sheldon. A Generation of Boomers: The pattern of Railroad labor Conflict in Nineteenth century America. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1987. 

White, William Thomas. "A History of Railroad Workers in the Pacific Northwest, 1883-1934." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, 1981.  DAI, 42, no. 12A, (1981): 5224.  In the 1890s, the Gilded Age pattern of community support for insurgent workers achieved its most dramatic expression in the Coxeyite Movement, the Great Northern Strike, and the Pullman Strike of 1894, during which the region's Populist, anti-railroad mood supported militant action by unemployed railway workers and those belonging to the American Railway Union.